倒退
總覺得有一些強詞奪理的佛法,似乎又要把佛法變回它在迦葉佛就存在在內地的?
佛教只有迦葉尊者沒有迦葉佛,
迦葉佛已經是後代佛法的流傳再加上去的稱號,
這樣寫是指內地的佛法又比印度更早存在,
這樣的意義是讓整個佛法再度倒退到可以顛覆佛教歷史,
顛覆歷史致使文明倒退,只讓自己吸收到最低級的文化,
這其中到底嘉惠了誰?
半寄
Some forced interpretations of Buddhist teachings seem to claim that Buddhism had already existed in the mainland since the time of Kāśyapa Buddha.
However, in Buddhism, there is only Kāśyapa the Elder, not a “Kāśyapa Buddha.”
The title "Kashyapa Buddha" is an addition made in the later transmission of the Dharma.
Writing in such a way implies that the Buddhist teachings in Mainland China predate those of India.
Such a claim regresses the entire Buddhist tradition, to the point of overturning Buddhist history. And overturning history leads to cultural regression, allowing only the most primitive cultural elements to be absorbed.
Who, exactly, benefits from this?
Master Banji
沒有留言:
張貼留言