2026年11月6日 星期五

飛碟思考—三世實有 法體恆存3UFO Reflections — The Three Times Exist in Reality; the Dharma Entities Endure 3

 飛碟思考—三世實有 法體恆存3


回想一下,我應該是實地看過肉眼看不見的虛雲老和尚,來跟我說ㄧ些事以後,

有一天猛然想起看過的部派佛教「三世實有 法體恆存」的討論內容。


從而想到,那可能不是學術問題而已,還有佛教這麼龐大的修行陣容,修行有成就的行者,對涅槃延伸出來的看法!


像虛老的法體還是可以在空間中自由活動,讓我把很多佛法有關於學問的記載,慢慢的拉回實地去做思考。


實地的思考,他們在修行中碰到的困難,還有修行中發現的之前佛陀時代沒有說明的法體問題。


例如:虛老的出現,就必須去思考他的法體沒有涅槃,還在這裡活動,而且還在關心人世間的事情,這之前的《雜阿含經》沒有記載也看不到相關的討論。


很多佛教留下來的經論討論,都是嚴謹的,

但如果牽涉到實地的修行內容,又顯得都是神秘的境界,是不可說的?


我個人把一些我親身經歷的事寫出來,

並不想界定什麼定義,

只提供讀者做參考用。

半寄


UFO Reflections — The Three Times Exist in Reality; the Dharma Entities Endure 3

Looking back, I believe I often encountered the Venerable Master Xuyun, who is invisible to the naked eye. After he came to speak with me about certain matters, there was a day when I suddenly remembered the discussions in Sarvāstivāda Buddhism concerning the doctrine of "the three times exist in reality and the Dharma entities endure."

 

This led me to realize that the subject might not be merely an academic issue. It could also involve the perspectives developed by the vast Buddhist community of practitioners, particularly accomplished practitioners, regarding the understanding of Nirvana and the ideas that evolved from it.

 

For example, the Dharma entity of Venerable Xuyun still seemed capable of moving freely through space. This experience prompted me to reconsider many records and scholarly discussions concerning Buddhist teachings from the perspective of actual experiences.

 

Thinking from the perspective of actual practice, we need to consider the difficulties practitioners encounter during their spiritual cultivation, as well as the questions about the Dharma entities that they may discover through practice—questions that were not explicitly addressed during the Buddha's time.

 

For example, the appearance of Venerable Xuyun raises an important question: His Dharma entity does not appear to have entered Nirvana, since he is still active here and continues to show concern for matters in the human world.

 

Yet the earlier Saṃyukta Āgama (Connected Discourses) contains no record of this phenomenon, nor does it offer any related discussion.

 

Many Buddhist scriptures and treatises preserve discussions that are rigorous and carefully reasoned.

 

However, when it comes to actual experiences encountered during spiritual practice, these matters often seem to enter the realm of mysterious or extraordinary experiences—experiences that are considered difficult or impossible to explain in words.

 

I am sharing some events that I have personally experienced.

 

I do not intend to establish or impose any particular definitions or conclusions. I simply offer these experiences for readers to consider as a reference.

 

Master Banji




飛碟思考—三世實有 法體恆存2UFO Reflections — The Three Times Exist in Reality; the Dharma Entities Endure 2

 飛碟思考—三世實有 法體恆存2

(印度聖者昨天晚上就很開心吵著說:要我寫出他認同法體必須補充能量——我沒有寫出,他也清楚還在這邊吵,😄 ,我們現在是部派佛教的討論。)


讀者們必須思考到一個問題,佛陀距離現在約2600年,

當時人們對於永恆的信仰是什麼?

在那麼古老的年代人的壽命也不過是4-50歲,

那假設二百年是永恆,五百年是永恆,ㄧ千年在當時的人們知識如何去想像與定義?


所以我認為是形式上的永恆?

還是實質內容的永恆?

這個也必須搞清楚,這也是很多修行者一直沒有辦法弄清楚的實質意義。


佛陀當時只說到涅槃,

後世部派佛教發展出法體的討論。

當時也發展出宇宙不是永恆不變的說法。


我把這些資料查一下提供參考。

半寄


以下AI資料:


1.以涅槃為終極目標:

佛陀關注的是現實的苦(四聖諦),

並透過修行(八正道)導向苦的息滅,這個煩惱止息、不再輪迴的寂靜狀態,

就是「涅槃」。


此時的涅槃是一種「境界」與「狀態」,而不是去探討宇宙的物質底層是什麼。 


後世部派佛教:

走向哲學化的「法體」討論

佛陀入滅數百年後,


佛教僧團因為對戒律與教義的理解不同而分裂成各大部派(部派佛教時期)。


為了與古印度其他發達的哲學派別(如勝論派、數論派)進行辯論,

並建立佛教自身的理論體系,部派佛教開始走向阿毘達磨(對法的精密研究),


重點轉向了本體論。 


其中最著名的就是「說一切有部」(簡稱有部):

提出「法體恆有」:有部為了圓滿解釋因果業力的相續(過去造的業,為什麼現在會受報?),提出了著名的「三世實有,法體恆有」理論。 


什麼是法體?:

他們將世間萬事萬物拆解成最基本的元素(如五位七十五法)。


他們認為,這些基本元素(法)的「功能作用」雖然在過去、現在、未來不斷流轉生滅(無常),

但這些元素的「本質(法體)」是嚴然存在、恆常不失的。 


涅槃的實體化:

在這種思維下,有部甚至認為「涅槃」也是一種實有自體的法(擇滅無為),


聖者是透過智慧觀見了法體,進而證入一個實有存在的寂滅狀態。 


2.佛陀年代的主要學說對比:

在距今約 2600 年前的佛陀時代(西元前 6 至 5 世紀的古印度),現代意義上的「實驗科學」尚未誕生,


當時世界上最先進、最前沿的「科學觀念」主要體現在樸素唯物主義哲學、天文宇宙觀、微觀物質學說以及邏輯醫學中。 


當時古印度正處於「沙門思潮」的思想大變革時期(類似中國的春秋戰國百家爭鳴)。


以下是當時世界上最先進、且與現代科學高度共鳴的幾大觀念: 

1. 微觀物質觀:「極微」學說(原子論的雛形)


當時古印度的自然哲學派別(如順世論、勝論派,以及後來的佛教)發展出了極微(Paramāṇu)的觀念。 


核心觀念:他們認為世間萬物都是由肉眼看不見、不可分割的最小物質單元——「極微」所構成。

地水火風(四大):


這與古希臘德謨克利特的「原子論」幾乎同時代,他們用「地(固態)、水(液態)、火(熱能)、風(氣態/動能)」四種基本元素的聚合來解釋物質的形成,這在當時是最先進的物質構成科學觀。 


2.宏觀宇宙觀:無限時空與多重宇宙

在當時多數文明(如古埃及、早期的美索不達米亞)還認為地球是平的、天空是個蓋子時,古印度的思想界已經突破了地心說的限制:


空間的無限性:佛教與其他沙門思潮提出了「三千大千世界」的概念。他們認為一個太陽與月亮普照的範圍是一小世界(相當於一個恆星系),

一千個小世界組成小千世界,乃至結構出「大千世界」,這與現代天文學發現的銀河系、星系團群結構驚人地相似。 


時間的週期性:提出了「成、住、壞、空」的宇宙演化週期(稱為「劫」)。

「宇宙不是永恆不變的」,而是經歷誕生、擴張、毀滅到化為虛無的循環,

這與現代天體物理學的宇宙大爆炸、宇宙塌縮理論在宏觀邏輯上完全契合。 


3. 因果與規律觀:反對神創,崇尚自然規律

在佛陀時代以前,印度社會由婆羅門教主導,迷信「祭祀萬能」與「神創世界」。


但佛陀與同時代的自由思想家(沙門)提出了當時最震撼的科學態度: 

緣起論(因果律):


佛陀提出「此有故彼有,此生故彼生」,認為世間萬物的生滅都是條件(因緣)具備後的自然現象,沒有任何一個造物主或超自然的神在控制。


這種「無神論」且強調客觀規律的態度,是現代科學「實證因果律」的核心基石。 


4. 醫學與心理學:四大不調與心理分析

當時古印度的醫學(如後來演變成阿育吠陀的早期胚胎)已經有了高度發展:


最早、最先進的認知心理學與意識科學。 


同期世界對比

在佛陀活躍的西元前 6 世紀左右:

古希臘:泰勒斯(Thales)剛提出「水是萬物的本源」,泰勒斯、畢達哥拉斯等正開啟歐洲的理性哲學與幾何學。


中國:老子與孔子正提出「道法自然」與「儒家倫理」,

中國也正從迷信天命轉向理性思辨。

當時古印度的宇宙觀、原子論以及反神創的因果規律觀,無疑是當時整個地球上最宏大且最接近現代科學邏輯的先進觀念。



UFO Reflections — The Three Times Exist in Reality; the Dharma Entities Endure 2

 

(The Indian Sage was happily and persistently insisting last night that I should write about his agreement with the idea that Dharma entities must receive additional energy. I didn't write it down, but he clearly continued insisting on it here. 😄 We are currently discussing the Sarvāstivāda school's Buddhist doctrines.)

 

Readers need to consider an important question:

 

The Buddha lived approximately 2,600 years ago. What did people at that time understand by the concept of eternity?

 

In such ancient times, the average human lifespan was only around 40 to 50 years. If something lasting 200 years was considered eternal, or if 500 years or even 1,000 years was regarded as eternal, how could people of that era, with their knowledge and understanding of the world, imagine and define eternity?

 

Therefore, I believe we need to distinguish between two possibilities:

 

Does eternity refer to eternity in form, or does it mean that the actual substance or content remains eternal?

 

This distinction must be clearly understood. It is also an essential point whose deeper meaning many Buddhist practitioners have never fully understood.

 

Master Banji

 

AI Data Below

 

1. Nirvana as the Ultimate Goal

 

The Buddha’s Original Teaching

 

The Buddha focused on the reality of human suffering, explained through the Four Noble Truths.

 

He taught people to follow the Noble Eightfold Path to end suffering.

 

This peaceful state, in which all mental suffering and attachments come to an end and the cycle of rebirth stops, is called Nirvana.

 

At this stage, Nirvana was understood as a spiritual experience or state of mind. It was not about discussing what the universe is made of at its most basic level.

 

Later Buddhist Schools: The Development of Philosophical Theories

 

Several hundred years after the Buddha passed away, the Buddhist community split into different schools because monks had different opinions about Buddhist teachings and rules.

 

This period is known as Early Buddhist Schools or Sectarian Buddhism.

 

To debate with other advanced Indian philosophical schools, such as Vaisheshika and Samkhya, and to build their own philosophical system, Buddhist scholars began to develop Abhidharma, which is the detailed study and analysis of Buddhist teachings.

 

Their focus gradually shifted toward questions about the basic nature of reality.

 

The Sarvastivada School

 

One of the most famous schools was the Sarvastivada school.

 

It developed a well-known theory called:

 

“Everything Exists in the Three Periods of Time.”

 

The theory states that the basic nature of all things always exists, even though their functions and activities change over time.

 

Why did they develop this theory?

 

They wanted to explain how karma continues from the past to the present.

 

For example, if someone did something in the past, why can that action produce results in the present?

 

What Is “Dharma Entity”?

 

The Sarvastivada school divided everything in the world into basic elements called Dharmas.

 

They developed a system of 75 Dharmas to explain the world.

 

They believed that:

 

* The functions and activities of these Dharmas change over time.

* Their basic nature, or Dharma Entity, always exists.

* Their nature does not completely disappear, even when their functions change from the past to the present and future.

 

In other words, things are constantly changing, but their basic nature continues to exist.

 

Nirvana Becomes a Real Existing Thing

 

Based on this way of thinking, the Sarvastivada school also considered Nirvana to be a real and independent Dharma.

 

They called it “Pratisaṃkhyā-nirodha” (cessation through wisdom).

 

They believed that enlightened people could understand the true nature of Dharmas through wisdom and enter a real state of complete cessation.

 

2. Comparing the Main Ideas During the Buddha’s Time

 

About 2,600 years ago, during the Buddha’s lifetime (around the 6th to 5th century BCE), modern experimental science did not yet exist.

 

However, some of the most advanced ideas of that time could be found in natural philosophy, astronomy, theories about matter, logic, and medicine.

 

Ancient India was going through a major period of intellectual change known as the Shramana movement.

 

This period was somewhat similar to China’s Spring and Autumn and Warring States periods, when many different schools of thought competed and developed.

 

Here are some important ideas from that period that have interesting connections with modern scientific thinking.

 

1. The Nature of Matter: The Theory of Tiny Particles

 

Ancient Indian philosophical schools, such as Lokayata, Vaisheshika, and later Buddhist schools, developed the idea of extremely tiny particles called Paramanu.

 

The basic idea was that everything in the physical world was made of very small particles that could not be seen with the naked eye and could not be divided further.

 

The Four Great Elements: Earth, Water, Fire, and Wind

 

They used four basic elements to explain the formation of matter:

 

Earth: solid materials

Water: liquid materials

Fire: heat and energy

Wind: air and movement

 

This idea was similar in some ways to the atomic theory developed by the ancient Greek philosopher Democritus around the same historical period.

 

At that time, these ideas represented an important attempt to understand what matter is made of.

 

2. The Universe: Infinite Space and Multiple Worlds

 

While many ancient civilizations had simple ideas about the shape of the Earth and the sky, ancient Indian thinkers developed much larger ideas about the universe.

 

The Infinite Nature of Space

 

Buddhism and other Shramana traditions developed the concept of the “Three Thousand Great Thousand Worlds.”

 

According to this idea:

 

* One small world is a system illuminated by one sun and one moon.

* One thousand small worlds form a Small Thousand World.

* Larger groups of worlds form even bigger universal systems.

* These systems eventually form the Great Thousand World.

 

This shows that ancient Indian thinkers imagined a universe containing many worlds and large cosmic systems.

 

In a very general way, this idea may remind us of modern astronomy, which describes galaxies and galaxy clusters.

 

The Cycles of the Universe

 

Ancient Indian thought also described the universe through four stages:

 

Formation (Creation)

Existence (Stability)

Destruction (Decay)

Emptiness (Dissolution)

 

These four stages are called “Kalpas” or cosmic cycles.

The basic idea is that the universe is not permanent or unchanging.

Instead, it goes through cycles of formation, existence, destruction, and emptiness.

This has some similarities to modern discussions about the possible evolution and future of the universe, although ancient Buddhist cosmology and modern astrophysics are very different systems.

 

3. Cause and Result: Natural Laws Instead of a Creator God

 

Before the Buddha’s time, Brahmanism was an important religious tradition in Indian society.

Some religious beliefs placed great importance on rituals and the power of gods.

However, the Buddha and other thinkers of the Shramana movement introduced a different way of understanding the world.

 

The Theory of Dependent Origination

 

The Buddha taught:

“When this exists, that exists. When this arises, that arises.”

This means that everything happens because certain causes and conditions come together.

Things do not simply happen without reasons or conditions.

The Buddha’s teaching did not require a creator God to control everything in the universe.

Instead, it emphasized causes, conditions, and natural processes.

This way of thinking has an interesting connection with the modern scientific approach, which also studies cause-and-effect relationships and how natural processes work.

 

4. Medicine and Psychology: Understanding the Body and Mind

 

Ancient Indian medicine was already developing during this period. Some of its early ideas later became part of Ayurveda, the traditional Indian medical system.

 

A Rational Understanding of Disease

 

Some ancient Indian doctors, including Jivaka, who was traditionally known as the Buddha’s personal physician, studied diseases through physical causes rather than simply blaming spirits or supernatural forces.

 

They considered factors such as:

Diet and nutrition

Climate and environment

Imbalances in the body’s four elements

 

Herbal medicine and surgical treatments were also practiced.

 

An Early Understanding of Psychology and Consciousness

 

The Buddha introduced the concept of the Five Aggregates (Five Skandhas):

Form: The physical body.

Feeling: Pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral feelings.

Perception: Recognizing and identifying things.

Mental formations: Thoughts, intentions, and mental activities.

Consciousness: Awareness through the senses and mind.

 

This system analyzes how human beings experience the world through the body and mind.

 

The Buddha also explained how the six senses work:

 

* Eyes

* Ears

* Nose

* Tongue

* Body

* Mind

 

These ideas provide an interesting early philosophical analysis of human perception, memory, emotions, and mental activities.

 

Some of these ideas can be compared with modern psychology and consciousness studies, although they are not the same as modern scientific theories.

 

3. A Comparison with Other Civilizations During the Same Period

 

Around the 6th century BCE, when the Buddha was active, other major civilizations were also developing new ideas.

 

Ancient Greece

 

Thales

Thales proposed that water was the basic substance from which everything came.

Greek thinkers such as Thales and Pythagoras were beginning to develop rational philosophy and mathematics.

 

Ancient China

 

Laozi and Confucius

Laozi promoted the idea of following the natural way of the universe (Dao).

Confucius focused on moral values, social relationships, and human ethics.

Chinese thought was also moving toward more rational discussions about nature, society, and human life.

 

Ancient India

 

Ancient Indian thinkers developed several important ideas:

* Tiny particles as the basic elements of matter.

* A universe containing many worlds and large cosmic systems.

* The idea that the universe changes through cycles.

* Cause and effect as the natural basis of events.

* Understanding the human body, mind, and consciousness.

 

These ideas show that ancient India had a rich and advanced philosophical tradition.

 

Some of its ideas have interesting similarities to modern scientific thinking, especially in the study of matter, the universe, cause and effect, and human consciousness.

 

Overall, ancient Indian philosophy was one of the most ambitious intellectual traditions of the ancient world. It raised questions about the nature of matter, the universe, life, and the human mind that people continue to explore today.

2026年11月5日 星期四

飛碟思考—— 三世實有 法體恆存1UFO Reflections — The Three Times Exist in Reality; the Dharma Entities Endure 1

 飛碟思考——三世實有 法體恆存


讀者問說:我在「飛碟思考」文章內容寫出,「法體」的觀點,「法體」怎麼可能還會福報降低?


半寄回答:

修行者的「法體」最後的修道成果,

無論是用涅槃形容或者是以不生不滅來表述,我們都認為祂應該是永恆的才是真理。


我也是這樣子認為,但所謂的永恆是形式上的意義,還是真實的意義?

我在45歲以後對這個問題窮追猛究,因為連我自己也迫切想明白,涅槃是不是真的是永恆不滅,

那永恆不滅的內容到底又是什麼?


老實說,我在45歲的時候對佛法的追求有一種很累的感覺,

但那種還沒有到達目的地的渴望,逼迫著我再往前走。


我渴望自己能明白什麼叫止息(中止)——涅槃。


我只能說:或許佛陀的涅槃我還不懂!


但我目前看過修道有成的高僧,包括我本身走過的境界,

我的體會與理解修行者的「法體」是一種能量,

能量可以橫跨千年,就像印度聖者一樣,

他的自述:他是修持「唯識學」有成就的修行者,

印度唯識學(瑜伽行派)的形成與創立時間(公元3世紀至5世紀),距離現在(2026年)大約是 1500年 到 1800年前,


這麼久的時間他還是維持一定的能量,但這份能量需不需要補充呢?


如果我說:要補充,佛教界是不會同意的!

那如果我說:聖者補充能量的方法,是行菩薩道的福,或許還有可商量的餘地,那就看你們自己的認同了!


拋開學說論點,法體恆存——如真是指修行者的法體現象,是否是另一個觀點。


到目前為止,我個人的認同即使是修行者的「法體」,也沒有永恆的存在。

半寄


UFO Reflections — The Three Times Exist in Reality; the Dharma Entities Endure 1

 

A reader asked:

 

“In my article UFO Reflections, I mentioned the concept of the ‘Dharma Entities’. How could the Dharma Entities possibly experience a decline in its accumulated blessings?”

 

Banji's Response:

 

The ultimate spiritual attainment of a practitioner’s “Dharma Entity”—whether described in terms of Nirvāṇa or expressed as being beyond arising and ceasing—is generally understood to be eternal. We regard this as the truth.

 

I hold the same view. However, does eternity refer merely to a formal or conceptual sense of permanence, or does it refer to something that truly exists?

 

After the age of 45, I pursued this question relentlessly because I myself urgently wanted to understand it. Is Nirvāṇa truly eternal and imperishable? And what exactly is the nature of this supposed eternal existence?

 

To be honest, when I was 45, I began to feel exhausted by my pursuit of the Dharma. Yet my longing to reach a destination I had not yet attained compelled me to keep moving forward.

 

I longed to understand what it means to bring something to an end—Nirvāṇa.

 

All I can say is this: perhaps I still do not understand the Buddha’s Nirvāṇa!

 

However, based on what I have observed of accomplished Buddhist masters, as well as the spiritual states I have personally experienced, my understanding and personal experience suggest that a practitioner's “Dharma Entity” is a form of energy.

 

This energy can extend across thousands of years, as in the case of the Indian Sage.

 

According to his own account, he is a practitioner who attained accomplishment through the cultivation of Yogācāra (the Consciousness-Only school).

 

The Indian Yogācāra school, also known as the Yogācāra tradition, took shape and was established between the third and fifth centuries CE. This means its origins date back approximately 1,500 to 1,800 years from the present year, 2026.

 

Despite such a long passage of time, he still maintains a certain level of energy. But does this energy need to be replenished?

 

If I say that it does, the Buddhist community will not agree!

 

However, if I suggest that the Sage replenishes his energy through the merit and blessings accumulated by practicing the Bodhisattva Path, perhaps there may be room for discussion. Whether you find this explanation acceptable is up to you.

 

Setting aside doctrinal arguments, could the idea that the Dharma Entities endure eternally—as expressed by Ruci—be another way of looking at the phenomenon of a practitioner's Dharma Entity?

 

At this point, my personal view is that even a practitioner's “Dharma Entity” does not exist eternally.

 

Master Banji



2026年11月4日 星期三

飛碟思考UFO Reflections

飛碟思考

(有讀者建議標題改為「幽浮」,

但它是有秩序的直線飛行,不是亂飛,不能說是幽浮,文章裡面只是借用熟悉的字眼而已!)


之前的文章寫過,在我大約30歲的時候,秋天某天下午約3-4點左右,親眼看過兩個圓型的幽浮已經是黯淡的顏色,就從我們2個人的身邊飛過去。


大約一層樓高的高度,

當時覺得速度很快。現在跟印度聖者比較那當然是不能比的!


這個部分印象中寫過了,但我當時除了目瞪口呆之外,

也在想,那感覺是有「生命體」的,

但是它不是機器,它就是一個圓形的虛幻幽浮🛸,是什麼力量讓它飛動的?


最近看到印度聖者的速度,再度想起當年看到的景象,

像虛雲老和尚們,

因為是華人的大圓滿思想,

所以他們修得的法身,是一個圓形的滿月狀月亮極光樣的法體,


對比於印度「學唯識」聖者,他們喜歡的是思考還有記載文字,所以他們的法身反而是人體的呈現。


那陣子,看過很多研究有關於飛碟方面的文章,如再出現有關於飛碟的報導一定會看完。


但我認為沒有寫到與觀察到重點,

我覺得那個圓形的飛行物,是有生命的,

但看起來是什麼內容都沒有?

就是一個虛幻體,它是如何飛行的?


最近印度聖者的示現,似乎給我一個具體的答案,虛老他們畢竟是在感應中看到的,沒有辦法用照片的方式呈現。


而這個世界上各國的修行者太多了,

每一位修行的內容跟思想也完全不一樣,


如果這些像虛幻的飛行物,也是一種法體的呈現呢?


黯淡的顏色,代表它們既使看起來是沒有生命的,是不是也是福報在退去,導致呈現黯淡的顏色?


(指我當年看到的幽浮飛碟的顏色,不是貼出的照片中的樣子。)


今天寫出飛碟思考,把30餘年前親身看到,卻弄不懂的現象做ㄧ個整理。


不管我前面的路會呈現什麼🤔

我始終對這一輩子修行所得到的一切,感到滿意!


對修行世界及無形力量能夠全盤做個理解,

這種喜悅,始終充滿我個人的精神世界。

半寄






 
UFO Reflections
 
(Some readers have suggested changing the title to “UFOs.” However, what I saw was flying in an orderly, straight line, not moving around randomly. So I would not necessarily call them UFOs. I am simply borrowing a familiar term in this article.)
 
I wrote in an earlier article that when I was about 30 years old, one autumn afternoon, sometime around 3 or 4 p.m., I personally witnessed two round UFOs, already dim in color, flying right past the two of us.
 
They were flying at approximately the height of a one-story building. At the time, I felt they were moving very fast. Of course, compared with the speed demonstrated by the Indian Sage I have recently seen, their speed would be nothing in comparison!
 
I believe I have written about this experience before. But apart from being completely stunned, I also had another thought: the objects seemed to have some kind of “life” within them.
Yet they were not machines. They appeared to be round, ethereal UFO-like forms. What kind of force was making them move through the air?
 
Recently, after seeing the extraordinary speed demonstrated by the Indian Sage, I was reminded once again of what I had witnessed many years ago.
Take Venerable Master Xuyun and other Chinese Buddhist masters, for example.
Because their spiritual tradition was rooted in the Chinese philosophy of Great Perfection, the Dharmakaya they attained manifested as a perfectly round, full-moon-like body, resembling an aura of light.
 
In contrast, the Indian Sage, who studies Yogacara, or Consciousness-Only Buddhism, seems to favor thinking, contemplation, and the recording of written teachings. His realized Dharmakaya, therefore, appears in a human form.
 
During that period, I read many articles and studies about UFOs. Whenever I came across another report about them, I would always read it to the end.
 
However, I felt that these articles never really addressed the most important points, nor did they make the observations that mattered.
 
I had the feeling that those round flying objects were alive. Yet, when looking at them, they seemed to contain nothing at all.
 
They appeared to be empty, ethereal forms. So how exactly were they able to fly?
 
The recent manifestations of the Indian Sage seem to have given me a more concrete answer.
 
After all, what Venerable Master Xuyun and other Chinese masters perceived was through spiritual perception and inner experience. Such phenomena could not be captured and presented through photographs.
 
There are so many spiritual practitioners in different countries around the world, and each person's spiritual practice, experiences, and way of thinking are completely different.
 
What if these seemingly illusory flying objects are also manifestations of a kind of Dharmakaya?
 
Could their dim colors represent a decline in spiritual blessings or merit? Even though they appear lifeless, could their fading appearance be a sign that their blessings and merits are gradually diminishing?
 
(To clarify, I am referring to the dim color of the UFO-like objects I personally witnessed many years ago, not the appearance of the objects in the photographs I shared.)

Today, I put my thoughts on UFOs into writing, bringing together and organizing experiences I personally witnessed more than 30 years ago but could not fully understand at the time.

Whatever the road ahead may hold, I remain deeply content with everything I have gained through a lifetime of spiritual cultivation.

The joy of gaining a comprehensive understanding of the spiritual realm and unseen forces has always been a profound and lasting part of my inner world.
Master Banji