2026年11月12日 星期四

轉折點的不定The Uncertainty of Turning Points

 轉折點的不定

昨天處理完南禪內部的事,晚上7點就躺平了!


在佛法的修行上給的最好思想是「不定論」,


「不定論」用於人的修行修練觀點——

縱使修行者已經有高超的修煉功力,還是不能給別人下定論。


原因;通常在看到一個人心裡的猶豫時,不能就假定他下一步將選擇哪一個方向?


以佛法的立場而言,我們總是希望他往好的方向去做選擇,在還沒有做出選擇之前,也不能認為他做錯了!


人性存在著很大的缺陷,但人能修行,是因為在這個「不定點」上有很大的個人意志選擇。

這看似在腦海中不斷閃爍的不定點選擇,

每一個轉折點,同時也決定了對於佛法認知的人,能不能往前跨步,

我個人在佛法上的成就,就是從對自我意志的陌生,到去確確地抓住每一個閃過看似浮沉的意想。


如果我個人腦海閃出的想法,是不利於別人的,想要利用別人的,都狠狠的給自己打一個❌,


敢於對自己下重手,絕對是我個人能夠修行奠下基礎的主因。


回頭看,許多人一邊講著佛學,ㄧ邊千方百計對自己縱容,

卻還想在我跟前,說他們已經很用功了!


我經常講:在佛法上的用功,是你對自己交代,你有沒有進步,自認在讀佛學跟努力的人自己不清楚,卻需要我肯定,

可能有這一回事嗎?


那如果讀佛學轉身處變成要欺世盜名,

這也夠累了!


在這麼文明的世代,有慧眼能夠ㄧ眼看穿你的人太多了!


特別感謝曾經要入侵南禪基金會的那隻手,

那隻手也充滿智慧的退去了!

半寄


The Uncertainty of Turning Points

 

Yesterday, after finishing the internal matters of NanZen, I lay down to rest at 7 p.m.!

 

One of the best ways of thinking in Buddhist practice is the principle of uncertainty.

 

Applying the principle of uncertainty to spiritual practice:

 

No matter how advanced a practitioner's spiritual abilities may be, they should never make a definite judgment about another person's future choices.

 

Why?

 

When we see someone struggling with hesitation in their mind, we cannot simply assume which direction they will choose next.

 

From the Buddhist perspective, we always hope that the person will choose the right direction. However, before that person has actually made a choice, we should not assume that they have made the wrong one.

 

Human nature has many serious shortcomings. Yet people are capable of spiritual practice because, at these uncertain turning points, they still have considerable freedom to make their own choices.

 

These choices may seem like uncertain points constantly flashing through the mind. Yet every turning point also determines whether someone who is developing an understanding of the Dharma can take another step forward.

 

My own achievements in Buddhist practice began with being unfamiliar with my own will. Gradually, I learned to clearly recognize and grasp every passing thought, even those that seemed to fluctuate and disappear in an instant.

 

Whenever a thought arose in my mind that could harm others or take advantage of them, I firmly marked it with a ❌.( I firmly tell myself that this is something I must directly forbid myself from doing.)

 

My willingness to be uncompromising with myself has absolutely been one of the main reasons I was able to lay a solid foundation for my spiritual practice.

 

Looking back, many people talk about Buddhist teachings while constantly finding ways to indulge themselves. Yet they still want to stand before me and claim that they have been practicing diligently!

 

I often say that diligence in Buddhist practice is something you must answer for to yourself. Whether you have made progress is something you should know for yourself.

 

People who consider themselves diligent in studying Buddhism should know whether they have truly made progress. Why should they need my approval?

 

Could that possibly make sense?

 

And if studying Buddhism eventually becomes a means of deceiving the world and seeking undeserved recognition, that must be exhausting!

 

In this highly civilized age, there are far too many people with the insight to see through you at a glance!

 

I would especially like to thank the hand that once attempted to intrude into the NanZen Foundation.

 

That hand was also wise enough to withdraw!

 

Master Banji


2026年11月10日 星期二

敬告讀者們A Notice to All Readers

敬告南禪讀者


(南禪基金會重要❗️公告)


半寄所解說的佛法,大多是以思維為基礎。


即使是曾經參加過南禪讀書會的大德,也未必能夠理解這些教法。

然而,能夠理解我所撰寫的佛法文章的讀者,應該都能從中有所獲益。


在此,我想明確說明一點:

這種以思維為基礎的佛法,並不是其他人能夠代替我宣講或解說的。


如果有人聽過我解說佛法之後,再向他人解說這些教法,

那應該視為個人的討論,

與南禪基金會及半寄無關。


此外,這種思想性質的佛法,也不需要任何傳人或指定的傳承者,

能夠理解的讀者,有善根肯用功就能得益。

特此聲明。

半寄


A Notice to All Readers

 

Most of the Buddhist teachings explained by Banji are based on intellectual inquiry and reasoning.

 

Even those who have attended NanZen study clubs may not necessarily understand these teachings. However, readers who can understand my written articles on the Dharma should gain something valuable from them.

 

I would like to make one point clear: no one else can teach or explain this approach to Buddhism, which is grounded in intellectual inquiry and reasoning, on my behalf.

 

If anyone who has listened to my Dharma explanations goes on to explain these teachings to others, that should be regarded as their own personal discussion. It has nothing to do with the NanZen Foundation or Banji.


Furthermore, this approach to Buddhist teachings does not require any successors or designated transmitters. Readers who are able to understand these teachings, have good wholesome roots, and are willing to make an effort will benefit from it.

 

This statement is hereby made for clarification.

Master Banji

2026年11月8日 星期日

飛碟思考—三世實有 法體恆存5UFO Reflections — The Three Times Exist in Reality; the Dharma Entities Endure 5

 飛碟思考—三世實有 法體恆存5


(感謝讀者跟我說:星象的觀察,還包括經驗的傳承。)


來說一些我個人的經歷:

才前兩天而已,感應中有人來告訴我一些星宿的事情,

他知道我的遲疑。


幾年前我發現,中國歷史記載裡面的夜觀天象(星宿)的問題是確有其事,

真的有一些奇人異士可以觀察到星象移動的意義,

這對於我而言,也是另一樁大開眼界的事!


7月去日本期間,某天晚上去看放大倍數的夜間望遠鏡,

而用肉眼就可以很清楚,看到人造衛星在移動,我還想說現代觀星象的人們,還看得準嗎?😄


不論是用佛法的因緣果角度,或者是用一些人們活過的經驗,都告訴我一種大能量聚集產生的影響,


但就我本身的態度而言,我只能50%相信這些能量展示的意義,50%一關闖過一關。


以我個人的修行經歷認知,在古代就可以對星宿做出一些理解,是確有其事。


而古印度文化源於其深厚的宗教與哲學修行傳統,

發展出獨特且深入的星宿與天象思考。


此外,古巴比倫、古中國與馬雅文明也同樣極度熱衷於星宿觀測,

只是各自的出發點不同(例如中國偏重皇權與國運,印度偏重宗教祭祀與個人靈魂修行)。


讀者說:我在「飛碟思考—三世實有 法體恆存3」

資料裡面提到的佛陀時代,


「空間的無限性:佛教與其他沙門思潮提出了「三千大千世界」的概念。他們認為一個太陽與月亮普照的範圍是一小世界(相當於一個恆星系),


一千個小世界組成小千世界,乃至結構出「大千世界」,這與現代天文學發現的銀河系、星系團群結構驚人地相似。」


有這麼先進嗎?會不會講得太離譜?

我查了一些資料在下面提供參考。


以下AI資料:


1.現代科學的視角差異:後世常將「一小世界」比擬為恆星系、「大千世界」比擬為星系團,但從古印度原典脈絡來看,


這其實是沿用當時印度對須彌山、四洲與天界的神話空間觀,並以此作為引導解脫的教學比喻


2.大乘經典中的「三千大千世界」概念,

並非大乘佛教時期才憑空創造,而是早在西元前 6 至 5 世紀的早期佛教時期(佛陀在世時)就已經出現,

其基礎宇宙元素甚至可追溯至更早的古印度婆羅門教時期。 


這個概念在印度的發展與演變時間軸如下:

1. 文化底層:古印度吠陀與婆羅門教時期(西元前 1500 – 前 600 年)


神話宇宙雛形:構成「小世界」的基礎元素——例如宇宙中心的須彌山、四大洲、日月繞行等觀念,

原本就屬於古印度傳統的宇宙觀,在吠陀(Veda)文獻與早期婆羅門教神話中便已存在。 


2. 概念確立:早期佛教與部派佛教時期(西元前 5 世紀 – 西元前 1 世紀

佛陀說法時期,佛教吸收並重組了古印度的單一須彌山宇宙觀,將其擴大為多層次的無限宇宙模型。 


早期經典記載:在代表早期佛教教義的《阿含經》(如《長阿含經・世記經》、《起世經》等)中,

就已經完整出現了「小世界 → 小千世界 → 中千世界 → 三千大千世界」的層級計算方式(共十億個小世界)。 


阿毘達磨系統化:隨後的部派佛教時期(如《俱舍論》等論典),進一步將三千大千世界的空間尺寸、時間成壞週期(成、住、壞、空)進行了極為精密的數學化與系統化整理。 


3. 哲學昇華:大乘佛教興起時期(西元前 1 世紀 – 西元 1 世紀後)

空間的無限擴展:大乘經典(如《華嚴經》、《法華經》、《大智度論》等)繼承了早期佛教的三千大千世界架構,並在此基礎上將宇宙觀推向極致。


從「一佛土」到「無量世界」:早期佛教通常認為一個三千大千世界是一尊佛的教化區(一佛國);大乘經典則進一步提出「十方有無量無數如恆河沙的三千大千世界」,以及「一微塵中含藏三千大千世界」的哲學圓融觀。


總結結構

印度傳統宇宙觀(須彌山、四大洲):約西元前 1000 年前已有雛形。

「三千大千世界」明確定義:約西元前 5 世紀隨著釋迦牟尼佛的教法與早期《阿含經》體系而確立。

大乘經典的運用:約西元前後隨大乘佛教興起,承襲此概念並擴展為「無量三千大千世界」的宏大敘事。

(圖片來源:網路資訊)


UFO Reflections — The Three Times Exist in Reality; the Dharma Entities Endure 5

(Thank you to the reader for reminding me that observing the stars also involves passing down experience from one generation to the next.)

 
Let me share some of my personal experiences.
Just two days ago, through a spiritual experience, someone came to tell me something about the stars and constellations.
He knew that I was hesitant about what I had heard.
 
Several years ago, I discovered that the accounts in Chinese historical records about observing the night sky and interpreting the movements of stars were actually based on real practices.
There really were unusual and gifted individuals who could observe the movements of celestial bodies and understand their significance.
For me, this was another eye-opening discovery!
 
During my trip to Japan in July, I went out one evening to look through telescopes with high magnification. However, even with the naked eye, I could clearly see artificial satellites moving across the sky. I remember wondering whether people who study celestial phenomena today can still make accurate observations! 😄
 
Whether viewed from the Buddhist perspective of causes, conditions, and results, or through the accumulated experiences of people who have lived through different events, both seem to point to the influence produced when enormous amounts of energy gather together.
 
However, as far as my personal attitude is concerned, I can only place 50% trust in the significance of these displays of energy. The other 50% is simply a matter of facing each challenge as it comes.
 
Based on my personal experience and understanding of Buddhist practice, I believe it is indeed possible that people in ancient times had developed some understanding of the stars and constellations.
 
Ancient Indian culture, in particular, grew out of a profound tradition of religious practice and philosophical inquiry. This gave rise to distinctive and in-depth ways of thinking about stars, constellations, and celestial phenomena.
 
In addition, the ancient Babylonian, Chinese, and Mayan civilizations were also deeply interested in observing the stars and constellations. However, their approaches and underlying purposes differed.
(For example, ancient China placed greater emphasis on imperial authority and the fate of the nation, while ancient India focused more on religious rituals and the spiritual cultivation of the individual.)
 
A reader asked:
In my article UFO Reflections — The Three Times Exist in Reality; the Dharma Entities Endure 3), I mentioned the period of the Buddha.
The article included the following passage:
“The Infinite Nature of Space: Buddhism and other Śramaṇa traditions proposed the concept of the ‘Three Thousand Great Thousandfold Worlds’. They believed that the area illuminated by one sun and one moon constituted a Small World (roughly equivalent to a star system).
 
One thousand Small Worlds formed a Small Thousandfold World, and this structure expanded further into a Great Thousandfold World.
This bears a remarkable resemblance to the structures of galaxies and galaxy clusters discovered by modern astronomy.”
 
The reader asked:
“Could people really have had such advanced knowledge back then? Isn't this going a little too far?”
I have looked up some information and provide it below for reference.
 
Master Banji
AI Data Below
 
1. Differences in Perspective from Modern Science
In later interpretations, the term “One Small World” is often compared to a star system, while the “Great Thousandfold World” is compared to a galaxy cluster.
However, when examined in the context of the original ancient Indian texts, this cosmological model was actually based on the traditional Indian mythological view of Mount Sumeru, the Four Great Continents, and the heavenly realms. It was used as a teaching analogy to guide people toward liberation.
 
2. The Origin and Development of the Concept of the “Three Thousand Great Thousandfold Worlds”
 
The concept of the “Three Thousand Great Thousandfold Worlds” (Trisāhasra Mahāsāhasra Lokadhātu) found in Mahāyāna scriptures was not invented from nothing during the Mahāyāna period.
It had already appeared in early Buddhism, during the Buddha's lifetime, around the 6th to 5th centuries BCE. The basic cosmological elements underlying this concept can even be traced back to the earlier Brahmanical traditions of ancient India.
The historical development of this concept in India can be outlined as follows:
 
1. Cultural Foundations: The Vedic and Brahmanical Periods of Ancient India (1500–600 BCE)
The early formation of the mythological universe
The basic elements of the “Small World”—such as Mount Sumeru at the center of the universe, the Four Great Continents, and the Sun and Moon revolving around the central mountain—were already part of the traditional Indian cosmological worldview.
These ideas can be found in Vedic literature and the mythology of early Brahmanism.
2. Establishment of the Concept: Early Buddhism and the Buddhist Schools (5th–1st centuries BCE)
During the Buddha's lifetime, Buddhism adopted and reorganized the ancient Indian cosmological model centered on a single Mount Sumeru. It expanded this model into a multilevel universe consisting of countless worlds.
 
Records in early Buddhist scriptures
In the Āgama scriptures, which preserve the teachings of early Buddhism, such as the Discourse on the World (Shiji Jing) in the Dīrgha Āgama and the Discourse on the Origin of the World (Qishi Jing), the complete hierarchical structure was already presented:
Small World → Small Thousandfold World → Middle Thousandfold World → Great Thousandfold World.
This system comprises a total of one billion small worlds.
Systematization in Abhidharma
During the subsequent period of the Buddhist schools, treatises such as the Abhidharmakośa further developed this cosmological system.
They organized the dimensions of the Three Thousand Great Thousandfold Worlds and their cycles of formation, existence, destruction, and emptiness into a highly detailed and systematic framework, including mathematical calculations.
 
3. Philosophical Development: The Rise of Mahāyāna Buddhism (Around the 1st Century BCE Onward)
 
The expansion of the universe to infinity
Mahāyāna scriptures, such as the Avataṃsaka Sūtra, the Lotus Sūtra, and Nāgārjuna's Mahāprajñāpāramitāśāstra, inherited the cosmological framework of early Buddhism and developed it into an even more expansive vision of the universe.
From “One Buddha Land” to “Infinite Worlds”
Early Buddhism generally regarded one Three Thousand Great Thousandfold World as the domain in which one Buddha taught and guided living beings—that is, one Buddha-land.
Mahāyāna scriptures went further, proposing that throughout the ten directions there are countless Three Thousand Great Thousandfold Worlds, as numerous as the grains of sand in the Ganges River.
They also developed the philosophical vision that an entire Three Thousand Great Thousandfold World could be contained within a single particle of dust.
 
Summary of the Historical Development
• Traditional Indian cosmology (Mount Sumeru and the Four Great Continents): Its basic form existed before approximately 1000 BCE.
• Formal establishment of the “Three Thousand Great Thousandfold Worlds”: This cosmological system took shape around the 5th century BCE through the Buddha's teachings and the early Āgama tradition.
• Its development in Mahāyāna scriptures: Around the beginning of the Common Era, with the rise of Mahāyāna Buddhism, this inherited concept was further expanded into a grand vision of countless Three Thousand Great Thousandfold Worlds.