Across Time and Space 3 A Reflection on Yogācāra (Consciousness-Only Buddhism)
Yesterday, after I wrote that I would no longer write about Yogācāra, I found myself, in my own experience, continuing an inner dialogue with the sages of Yogācāra until 9:53 this morning.
As far as I am concerned, I have already finished expressing my understanding of Yogācāra.
The central teaching of Yogācāra is the transformation of consciousness into wisdom.
In my previous writings, I have also explained that the complete realization of the Four Stages of Enlightenment in Buddhism—from the First Stage to the Fourth Stage—is itself the true transformation of the human being. In my view, this is precisely what Yogācāra means by “transforming consciousness into wisdom.”
Many teachings emphasize cultivation and self-discipline, yet they often overlook one simple fact: human beings cannot live solely by rational control.
The accomplishment of Buddhist practice is a genuine inner power. One who has truly attained realization lives with ease because of that realization itself—not because they are constantly using ordinary reason to restrain the body and mind.
Ultimately, every genuine investigation points back to the human being.
If someone tries to force themselves into perfect rational control through sheer willpower alone, it can easily create many psychological and practical problems.
Therefore, if Buddhist cultivation is discussed without the question of genuine awakening, it becomes little more than moral self-cultivation.
I have no intention of joining further discussions about ordinary self-improvement.
My focus has always been Buddhist realization, and I believe I have already explained the nature of the Buddhist stages of enlightenment.
Personally, I believe that the essential insights of Yogācāra are fulfilled within the realization of the Four Stages of Enlightenment.
Without such realization, trying to live entirely through rational control alone would be an exhausting way to live.
Buddhism contains many other discussions concerning the mind and consciousness, but I have not devoted much attention to those areas.
After this long inner dialogue, the sage finally accepted my perspective.
In fact, modern Western psychology has also developed extensive theories about the mind and consciousness.
Anyone wishing to study these subjects in greater depth would benefit from exploring that broader field as well.
However, the sage belongs to a much earlier era and has had no opportunity to learn these later developments. I simply asked that I no longer be disturbed, and, being a sage, the request was graciously accepted.
Previously, the sage said:
“Consciousness is an immense storehouse of memory.
Only memories with genuine power are preserved within it—
it is not the same as ordinary thoughts.”
But what should be done with those memories afterward?
In my opinion, writing them down serves little purpose, because profound memories inevitably involve personal privacy.
Once one reaches the First Stage, one naturally knows how to deal with them—quickly and effectively.
Buddhism cannot remain forever revolving around words.
Master Banji
(Tōdai-ji, Japan)