飛碟思考——三世實有 法體恆存
讀者問說:我在「飛碟思考」文章內容寫出,「法體」的觀點,「法體」怎麼可能還會福報降低?
半寄回答:
修行者的「法體」最後的修道成果,
無論是用涅槃形容或者是以不生不滅來表述,我們都認為祂應該是永恆的才是真理。
我也是這樣子認為,但所謂的永恆是形式上的意義,還是真實的意義?
我在45歲以後對這個問題窮追猛究,因為連我自己也迫切想明白,涅槃是不是真的是永恆不滅,
那永恆不滅的內容到底又是什麼?
老實說,我在45歲的時候對佛法的追求有一種很累的感覺,
但那種還沒有到達目的地的渴望,逼迫著我再往前走。
我渴望自己能明白什麼叫止息(中止)——涅槃。
我只能說:或許佛陀的涅槃我還不懂!
但我目前看過修道有成的高僧,包括我本身走過的境界,
我的體會與理解修行者的「法體」是一種能量,
能量可以橫跨千年,就像印度聖者一樣,
他的自述:他是修持「唯識學」有成就的修行者,
印度唯識學(瑜伽行派)的形成與創立時間(公元3世紀至5世紀),距離現在(2026年)大約是 1500年 到 1800年前,
這麼久的時間他還是維持一定的能量,但這份能量需不需要補充呢?
如果我說:要補充,佛教界是不會同意的!
那如果我說:聖者補充能量的方法,是行菩薩道的福,或許還有可商量的餘地,那就看你們自己的認同了!
拋開學說論點,法體恆存——如真是指修行者的法體現象,是否是另一個觀點。
到目前為止,我個人的認同即使是修行者的「法體」,也沒有永恆的存在。
半寄
UFO Reflections — The Three Times Exist in Reality; the Dharma Body Endures
A reader asked:
“In my article UFO Reflections, I mentioned the concept of the ‘Dharma Body’. How could the Dharma Body possibly experience a decline in its accumulated blessings?”
Banji's Response:
The ultimate spiritual attainment of a practitioner’s “Dharma Body”—whether described in terms of Nirvāṇa or expressed as being beyond arising and ceasing—is generally understood to be eternal. We regard this as the truth.
I hold the same view. However, does eternity refer merely to a formal or conceptual sense of permanence, or does it refer to something that truly exists?
After the age of 45, I pursued this question relentlessly because I myself urgently wanted to understand it. Is Nirvāṇa truly eternal and imperishable? And what exactly is the nature of this supposed eternal existence?
To be honest, when I was 45, I began to feel exhausted by my pursuit of the Dharma. Yet my longing to reach a destination I had not yet attained compelled me to keep moving forward.
I longed to understand what it means to bring something to an end—Nirvāṇa.
All I can say is this: perhaps I still do not understand the Buddha’s Nirvāṇa!
However, based on what I have observed of accomplished Buddhist masters, as well as the spiritual states I have personally experienced, my understanding and personal experience suggest that a practitioner's “Dharma Body” is a form of energy.
This energy can extend across thousands of years, as in the case of the Indian Sage.
According to his own account, he is a practitioner who attained accomplishment through the cultivation of Yogācāra (the Consciousness-Only school).
The Indian Yogācāra school, also known as the Yogācāra tradition, took shape and was established between the third and fifth centuries CE. This means its origins date back approximately 1,500 to 1,800 years from the present year, 2026.
Despite such a long passage of time, he still maintains a certain level of energy. But does this energy need to be replenished?
If I say that it does, the Buddhist community will not agree!
However, if I suggest that the Sage replenishes his energy through the merit and blessings accumulated by practicing the Bodhisattva Path, perhaps there may be room for discussion. Whether you find this explanation acceptable is up to you.
Setting aside doctrinal arguments, could the idea that the Dharma Body endures eternally—as expressed by Ruci—be another way of looking at the phenomenon of a practitioner's Dharma Body?
At this point, my personal view is that even a practitioner's “Dharma Body” does not exist eternally.
Master Banji

