2026年9月7日 星期一

問題回答Question and Response

 問題回答

 

既然理解都有困難,何必多言。

 

讀者問了問題,我剛好在研究10月要講的內容,

看懂這一段就等於回答了妳的問題,

 

所有的事都有同意與反對的聲音。


 

看你要選擇哪一方遵循,進而決定自己的前途。


 

這也永遠沒有答案,只能說自己慢慢去琢磨了!

 

半寄

 

【20.3】

 

於因緣和合之中,

如果已有「果」存在,

難道在和合中看不見「果」嗎?

但是,

在因緣和合中的確看不見「果」。


 

無論如何仔細觀察,我們永遠不會在種子、土壤、水分和適當溫度等因緣中發現新芽。


因此,「果在因緣和合中」的主張是沒有根據的。


 

當然,正如月稱所指出,「因中有果論」的支持者會堅持推論的根據。

(解讀龍樹菩薩27道題216頁)


 

淺白解釋

 

1.無論我們多麼仔細觀察,永遠無法在種子、土壤、水分或適當溫度等「因緣」當中,

單獨找到那個預先存在的「新芽」。


 

因此,主張「果早已隱藏在因緣和合之中」是站不住腳的。


 

過去我自己思考到這裡時,也曾因為「找不到一個既定存在的果」而感到一陣恐慌!


 

2.當然,正如月稱所指出,「因中有果論」的支持者會死守他們的推論

 

對一般人來說,「因中有果(有因就有果)」是最省力、最符合直覺的想像。


雖然現代人的經驗常告訴我們:有了因,即使有緣助力也不一定能結出果;

但人們依然習慣偏好「因中早已預存了果」的確定感。


 

因為接受「果並非預先存在,也沒有固定自性」,

對我們的常識來說實在太過顛覆了。

(第20品要推論的深度比較深,我這是在研究比較淺而易懂的說法)

 

 

Question and Response

 

If understanding itself is difficult, further words are unnecessary.

 

A reader asked a question. I am preparing for an October lecture; understanding this passage is itself the answer.

 

All issues invite both agreement and opposition.

 

What you choose to follow determines your path.

There is no final answer—only gradual reflection.

 

Master Banji

 

[20.3]

 

If the “result” already exists within the coming together of causes and conditions,

should it not be observable there?

Yet it is not seen.

 

No matter how closely we examine seed, soil, water, and temperature, no sprout is found within them.

Thus, the claim that “the result exists within causes and conditions” is unfounded.

 

Still, as Candrakīrti noted, advocates of “the result existing in the cause” will maintain their reasoning.

(Nagarjuna’s Middle Way: Mulamadhyamakakarika,   

Śūnyatā, p. 216)


 

Simple Explanation

1. No matter how closely we examine seed, soil, water, and temperature, no sprout is found within them.


Thus, the claim that “the result exists within the coming together of causes and conditions” cannot be sustained. 


 

In the past, when I first reflected on this, I felt a moment of panic at not finding any fixed, pre-existing “result.”


 

2. Still, as Candrakīrti noted, advocates of “the result existing in the cause” will maintain their reasoning.


 

For most people, “if there is a cause, there is already a result” is the easiest and most intuitive view.


 

Although experience often shows that causes and conditions do not guarantee a result,

 


people still prefer the idea that the result is already contained in the cause, because it feels more certain.

 


This is because the idea that results are not pre-existing and have no fixed nature goes against everyday common sense.

 

(Chapter 20: Examination of Combination—

the level of reasoning involved here is relatively deep.

What I am presenting here is a simpler and more accessible explanation for study.)

沒有留言: