四聖果
佛法結集時迦葉尊者發現阿難沒證四果而遭拒絕。
阿難被拒的事讓我起了很大的探索興致。
渴望理解佛法證悟三果到四果之間的心、意識差距究竟是？
強烈的好奇不斷在內心驅使！
再來，又是如何在人體的證悟裡界定三至四果的表現！
「色愛、無色愛」再怎麼說都是表現在人體的修道裡，
對聖者而言，這種屬於人體的心理、精神層面竟然可以在修行裡面呈現得很清
楚，還可以認定，這鐵錚錚是驚天動地的事。
屬於外在看不見的心、意識修行吸引我想去親自觸摸著，甚至是掛在腦袋及心裏
的大問題，沒能親自感受的證悟內容，像紙上的佛法敘述永遠是紙上的地圖而
已！
三果至四果之間，真的是無色愛（五下分結）的不同而已，還是對理解能力的高
度不同也必須釐清楚，這太有趣了！
半寄
The Four Fruition
Greetings, friends of NanZen!
When the Buddhist teachings were compiled,
Venerable Kāśyapa rejected Ānanda because he had not attained the fourth stage
of enlightenment. This event sparked my great curiosity and desire to explore
further.
I’m eager to understand the differences in
mind and consciousness between attaining the third and fourth stages of
enlightenment. This strong curiosity keeps driving me to seek answers!
Moreover, how is the transition from the
third to the fourth stage expressed in human experience? The attachments to
"form" and "formless realms" manifest through the human
body during spiritual practice. Howver, to the enlightened, these mental and
spiritual aspects become so clearly evident in their practice that they can be
identified with certainty.
This is truly astonishing!
The unseen cultivation of the mind and
consciousness fascinates me. I want to personally experience and explore these
unresolved questions that linger in both my mind and heart. Without direct
experience, the descriptions of enlightenment in Buddhist texts remain mere
maps on paper.
Is the difference between the third and
fourth stages simply about overcoming "formless attachment" (the five
lower fetters), or is it also about involving a significant leap in
comprehension? This is incredibly fascinating!
Master Banji
（截圖自台大獅子吼
所以佛法是世上最自由的，
應該賦予更大的解釋空間才對，
當然不能違背佛法。）
The scripture in the screenshot shows that Buddhism addresses different preferences and needs, making it the freest teaching in the world. It should allow broader interpretation, as long as it aligns with Buddhist principles.
沒有留言:
張貼留言