北傳佛教唯心論
如果認為「唯心論」是對的，那要思考一下，有些地方在教的「心包太虛，量周沙界」的「唯心論」，
可以想想，什麼樣的心才可以延伸到這麼大，而延伸到這麼大的心想要做什麼，心真的可以量巨觀與微觀？
還是專有的學問與知識才能衡量世界。
如我前面所言，「習性全無」好像是很完美的事，習性不是件殺人放火的事，
它只是一個人人性必有的性格而已，性格特質都沒有了，
人世間真的就沒有什麼好留戀的，哈！
且直接就可以解脫了！
「唯心」的想像，只能定位在勵志的第一步而已。
心想，還要通過努力，努力不一定有結果，這是佛法因、緣、果。
而去努力還會有機會，去努力會知道為什麼不會成功！
你認為學者的話沒道理嗎？
他們研究一輩子的學問，而且至少是三位學者通通持一致的看法，
而佛法也必須是有學問脈絡的，
，除了不食人間煙火的學問外，
學問的研究通常有其價值。
半寄
Mind-Only Doctrine in Northern Buddhism
If someone believes “mind-only” teachings are correct, then it’s worth thinking about what some people say: “The mind is as big as the whole universe, and it reaches all worlds.”
But what kind of mind could really be that big? And if the mind were truly that vast, what would it do with such size? Can the mind really measure both the macrocosm and the microcosm? Or is it specialized knowledge and scholarly disciplines that are able to measure the world?
As I mentioned earlier, having “no habits at all” may sound perfect, but habits aren’t crimes like killing or arson—they are simply natural parts of a person’s character. If a person had no character traits left, then nothing in this world would matter anymore. One could be liberated right away—haha!
“Mind-only” imagination is only the first step. After forming an intention, one must still make an effort, and effort does not always yield results — this follows the Buddhist teaching of causes, conditions, and effects.
Yet by making the effort, you still have a chance, and through trying, you will learn why things succeed or fail.
Thinking about it But hard work doesn’t always bring results — that’s the Buddhist teaching of causes, conditions, and effects. Still, if you work hard
Do you really think scholars’ views are unreasonable? They have devoted their entire lives to their fields, and at least three respected scholars agree on the same point.Buddhism also requires a coherent academic foundation.Aside from knowledge that is utterly detached from real life, academic research usually has its value.
Master Banji
沒有留言:
張貼留言