中觀27道題 Nagarjuna’s Middle Way: Greed and the Greedy

 

中觀27道題

南禪朋友好！

貪與貪染者

《中觀27道題》觀察貪與貪染者，67頁第6行直接點出「但是對

於阿毗達磨師而言，「人」不是勝義實有。

這裡也是《中觀論》的觀染染者品。

「人」不是勝義實有，換句話可以說「人」沒什麼好討論嗎？

（哈）說這話的中觀論師們有笑傲江湖的架式！

 記得苦讀《中論》時也是金庸小說的年代，

在苦悶的年代裡看到觀染染者都要拍案叫絕！

 而今《中觀27道題》的作者更直接指出論師的立場是「人」不是勝義，

我每次想到都要微笑好幾天！是啊！

憑什麼說大家都是貪婪者？

憑什麼說大家都有貪婪？

有人跟你的處境是不一樣的！（哈）

花的存在就是花，沒告訴「人」它的名字是貪。

而人的存在不是爲了貪染。「人」不是勝義，直接跳過染缸指出「人」的錯覺比較值得討論，令人神情愉悅！

半寄

 

Nagarjuna’s Middle Way: Greed and the Greedy

 Greetings, friends of NanZen!

Nagarjuna’s Middle Way Chapter 6: Rāga-raktaparīkṣā. observes afflictions and people who are afflicted. Greed and people who are greedy are also analyzed in Nagarjuna’s Middle Way:Mulamadhyamakakarika, and we read ‘but to Abhidhamma masters, “human (nature)” is not the ultimate truth or the permanent entity’ (Line 6, p 67).

 

‘Human nature’ is not the ultimate truth or the permanent entity. In other words, doesn’t it imply human nature doesn’t deserve so much attention? (Ha) The Middle Way masters who claim this can

Mulamadhyamakakarika, and we read ‘but to Abhidhamma masters, “human (nature)” is not the ultimate truth or the permanent entity’ (Line 6, p 67).

 ‘Human nature’ is not the ultimate truth or the permanent entity. In other words, doesn’t it imply human nature doesn’t deserve so much attention? (Ha) The Middle Way masters who claim this canindeed walk freely around the world as they wish.

 

It reminds me that it was also the era of Jin Yong's novels when I studied Nagarjuna’s Middle Way. In those depressing times, anyone who read of ‘observing afflictions and the afflicted.’ would be overwhelmed with admiration and shout ‘Bravo!’

 indeed walk freely around the world as they wish.

 It reminds me that it was also the era of Jin Yong's novels when I studied Nagarjuna’s Middle Way. In those depressing times, anyone who read of ‘observing afflictions and the afflicted.’ would be overwhelmed with admiration and shout ‘Bravo!’

And now, authors of Nagarjuna’s Middle Way: Mulamadhyamakakarika supplement directly that Abhidhamma masters don’t think ‘human nature’ is the ultimate truth. I would have been smiling for days whenever I think of this statement!

Yes!

Who are you to say everyone is a greedy person?

On what grounds do you say everyone has greed?

There are people in different situations than you! (Ha!)

The flower exists simply as a flower, and it doesn't tell ‘humans’ that its name is greed.

Likewise, nor do humans exist for greed.

 That ‘human nature’ is not the ultimate truth helps Buddhist practitioners skip the defilements of human nature directly, and focusmore on (correcting) misconceptions of ‘human nature’. It is inspiring and cheerful!

Master Banji

Translated by Grace Jui-hsin Tsai

 

 

 

空 Śūnyatā

 南禪朋友好！

      有大德問起「空」是什麼？

我個人依據《中論》的「八不」濃縮成我個人想要探索的方向，

建立一套我自己要用的「空」思惟，

這樣子做長達30餘年，我常常去思索因緣裡的「空」常年建立

由淺至深的探討，「空」需要熟悉「緣」的條

件。

（也可以說；佛法「空」的認知建立在緣起。

思考緣起不能出現理論互相矛盾。）

《中觀27道題》進一步指出因緣的呈現與狀態-空。

半寄

Greetings, friends of NanZen!

Someone asked what "Śūnyatā" is.

I summarize and integrate "eight negations" in Nāgārjuna’s Middle Way into a set of "Śūnyatā" ideas as my own guides to investigate and practice "Śūnyatā".

I have been doing this for more than 30 years. I often contemplatethe "Śūnyatā" in the context of causes and conditions, and investigate it from shallow to deep all year round. In approaching the Buddhist idea of "Śūnyatā", it’s necessary to have a clear understanding of "conditions".

(That is to say, the comprehending of "Śūnyatā" in Buddhism is based on Dependent Origination. The ideas resulting from our contemplating Dependent Origination must not    contradict thories of "Śūnyatā")

Nagarjuna’s Middle Way: Mulamadhyamakakarika supplements further that phenomena resulting from causes and conditions andtheir states are Śūnyatā.

 

 Master Banji

Translated by Grace Jui-hsin Tsai

 

 (簡言之,「空」的定義就是「無不變性、無獨立性、無實在性」

印順導師《般若經講記》),「空」所否定的是事物

本質,並不否定事物的生滅變化現象及其世間作用, 絕非甚麼都

「沒有」! 正如夢中所見景象不真實,但不能因此而否定夢境曾

經出現及其影響。)

(擷取自香港佛門網)

 In short, the definition of "Śūnyatā" is "no immutability, noindependence, no reality" (Venerable Yinshun’s Lectures on the Maha-Prajna-Sutra). What "Śūnyatā" denies is the essence of things, but not the changing phenomena of emergence/cease of things in the world. All these are by no means "nothing"!

It’s like the scenes seen in dreams are unreal, but the occurrence and impact of dreams can’t be denied. (Excerpted from Buddhistdoor, Hongkong https://www.buddhistdoor.org/mingkok/%E7%A9%BA%E4%B8%8D%E6%98%AF%E7%84%A1%E4%B8%8A/) 

 

 

 

賀新年2025 Happy New Year 2025, friends of NanZen

 南禪朋友2025年 新年快樂！

   一年將盡，感謝南禪精舍潮州、台南讀書會的持續進行！為了

讀書會的講解把曾經只在我個人腦海中思惟過的佛法慢慢整理出

來，過程的煎熬一言難盡！

      從密密麻麻的大藏經，到白話文，到佛法以外的學問⋯⋯幾

乎行雲流水的匆匆，本來認為不可能寫出來的（只供自用），

用禪師一個聲音表白，「啊！」

         感謝海內外佛學者對「南禪精舍修行的探討」部落格的熱

情，

用寫心得的方式闡述佛法，只想縮短很多有心佛學者的徘徊。

願 佛日增輝 佛水長流。

半寄

 Happy New Year 2025, friends of NanZen!!

 As the year is coming to an end, I am thankful for the ongoing

discussions of NanZen Vihara book clubs in Chaozhou and Tainan!

I used to consider the Buddhist teachings which I have contemplated in my mind too vast to organize (and thus only for guides to my personal practice). However, in order to lecture in the book clubs, I try to organize and paraphrase them in plain words gradually.

 

By integrating Taishō Tripiṭaka densely crammed full of words with plain speech as well as knowledge other than Buddhism, I can finally clarify Buddhist ideas I have comprehended in public. As for the sufferings of turning ideas into plain words, it's a long story! As timerushes by like nearly like flowing clouds and flowing water, only the Zen masters’ sigh of ‘Ah !’ is left to express my mood.

   

I appreciate Buddhists at home and abroad who are enthusiastic about my blog "Search For Enlightenment with Nan Zen Vihara; An Investigation into Practice of Buddhism". I explain the Dharma by writing down (actual practice) experiences, merely aiming to reduce and shorten the hesitation of those who set their mind to Buddhist practice.

 Ma Buddha’s sun/virtue brighten the world

and the Dharma Water flow forever

Master Ban Ji

Translated by Grace Jui-hsin Tsai

 

 

 

 

 

無明夢幻2 Ignorance And Illusion 2

無明夢幻2

      我們去看佛法談了很多「心與心所」的問題，也就是我們的

感官對應外界的一切知覺，

 

我們也可以說它是修行者研究過人的心、意、志的說明。

想要修行成功必須越過人本身的障礙，所以必須研究心、意、

志。

 

在個人的修持裏如把「心與心所」轉換成「我與我不能超越的

一件事加以挑戰」，

 

例如；我與我生氣的一件事，不斷挑戰我為什麼要生氣，一直

到躍過這件事情。

（當然這要清楚自我的心理力量，但這樣做賺得一分是一分）

這樣做建立起自己內心的力量成心智，

很多佛法的專有名詞便可以逐一清楚明白。

半寄

 

Ignorance And Illusion 2

"The mind and mental concomitants" have been widely discussed in Buddhism. To put it simply, they refer to all the perception our sense organs have when confronting the external world. They can be viewed as the practitioners’interpretation based on their investigation on human mind, ideas and will /mental effort.

A successful practitioner needs to investigate human mind, ideas and will to overcome difficulties of human nature.

 

I practice the term "the mind and mental concomitants" with the approach to “striving to challenge/elevate the situationsbetween something I cannot surpass and I”.

 

Take ‘challenging something making me angry and I’ as an example. 

I keep reflecting on why I was angry until I surmount my anger.

(This needs to be clear of my own inner power. However, it’s a matter of an inch progressed, an inch earned.)

 

By integrating our inner power cultivated in this way into mental wisdom, many Buddhist terms will become clear one by one.

                                                      

     Master Ban Ji 

Translated by Grace Jui-hsinTsai

 

 

無明夢幻1 Ignorance And Illusion

無明夢幻

南禪朋友好！

有大德問到，一切是無明、夢幻的佛法問題。

我的回答是：

        根據《阿含經》佛陀只說到無明，（也就是不明白）

 

現在講無明大夢，大夢兩個字會把修行的指標弄扭曲，

 

佛法是結構嚴謹的一套理論跟修行，

 

任何要加進去的字眼，都必須把頭跟尾說清楚，因為那關係到

修行能不能成功！

嚴格講是神聖的一件事情。

哪是誰讓自己在做夢？

 

從大夢中醒來，

如何證果位從來沒有看見被交代清楚過，

        然後不懂無明的人又在無明前面加了「無始」，變成無始

無明，又把無明推得很遠讓大家修行變成都是沒有希望的！

這些在佛法而言，已是誤解佛法的惡法。

 

這是學佛者，必定要清楚的點。

 

我個人的修行經驗是「無明」在善根裡面就可以修煉，為什

麼！

因為善根是要歷經考驗的，

我們總不能說我們就是好人吧！哈(哈)

 

在面對很多是非、善惡，的題目時善根的衝突點就會上來。

 

一個有智慧的人如何不被自己的無明（情緒）、慾望牽著走而

邁向光明面，這裡面的衝突、轉折、處理就是在衝破無明了！'

半寄

 

Ignorance And Illusion

Greetings, friends of NanZen!

A disciple asked of “All is ignorance and illusion” in Buddhism.

I replied that according to the Agama Sutra, the Buddha discussed merely ignorance, i.e. lack of knowledge. It is later generations that mention ‘the big dream of ignorance’,

The term "big dream" will distort the criteria of spiritual practice.

 

Buddhism is a religious philosophy equipped with well-structured theories and approaches to spiritual practice.

Every word to be added needs to be fully explained about its origins and effects. It relates to the success of Buddhist Practice. 

Strictly speaking, how does such a sacred thing have anything to do with dreaming?

 

The view ‘waking up from a big dream’ never mentions or explains clearly how to be enlightened.

What’s more, some people who are not clear of ignorance add "beginningless" to ignorance, and make up the term “beginningless ignorance”. 

This term causes ignorance to be more distant and Buddhist Practice to become frustrating!

Buddhists must identify such evil views that has misinterpreted Buddhism.

 

 

I find in my own practice that "ignorance" can be overcome in the process of cultivating virtuous roots. Why?

Because virtuous roots must survive the test of conflicts.

We can’t claim ourselves virtuous people merely because we have made some donations! (Ha ha)

When confronting many issues of right/wrong, good /evil, the conflict of virtuous roots will appear.

When a wise man is not led by his own ignorance (i.e. emotions) and desires, and then moves forward to a bright and virtuous world, he has actually overcome ignorance by surviving conflicts, modifying himself and solving problems!

                                                       

 Master Ban Ji

Translated by Grace Jui-hsin Tsai

 

挑戰 Challenge

南禪朋友大家好！

      在已知的印度觀念「微塵土」中思考《中論》結果是具足挑

戰，

在環環相扣的十二因緣中講斷我使、我慢，從來沒有大德反

思，

環環相扣如何抽一個環節出來斷掉？

半寄

Greetings, friends of NanZen!

 

Trying to interprete Nāgārjuna’s Middle Way with the Indian concep of “ minute dust particle” turns out to be challenging.

 When discussing to sever self-indulgence and self-conceit in the interlocking Twelve Links of Dependent Origination, no one has reflected on how toextract a link out of the interlocking links, and then severit?

 

Master Banji

Translated by Grace Jui-hsin Tsai