2025年12月6日 星期六

再談唯識學1Further Reflections on Yogācāra1

再談唯識學1 

 最近被問起《唯識學》的問題,把我個人拋得遠遠已不想看佛法,又拿出來想一想。
 前文已經提過,佛法後來分裂出唯心、唯識跟真如、如來藏心, 一般人既使唸到佛學博士學位,想搞清楚這些恐怕都不是這麼簡單的事情,
 這裡面除了學問,還有修證的問題,套句北傳佛法常講的,那是屬於百千萬劫的時間長河裡的修行了! 

 說到底,這麼多佛法學派的說法,都只是要把所謂的「本來的面目」找出來, 沒有「上帝」的佛教佛法, 似乎一直要用唯心,唯識、如來藏, 去取代上帝的存在,另一位存在形而上的「主要意識」

,這個「意識」具體大到可以無所不在? 彷彿,人一定要立一個真正的無形主人,才會過得舒適,
 如果是這樣,那豈不更應該朝自我的認識開始嗎?
 而「自我」是什麼?這個詞也是抽象的,
 你必須有很多知識上的力量才能理解, 

 尤其是上述的理論,在印度存在很久了,你要釐清它必須解讀得更多, 下面的截圖是《亞歷山大東征記》p.202一書裡面提到的印度思想, 
這麼多東西方哲學的唯物、唯識論一般人要釐清它要耗費1-20年的。

 有一個簡單的方法可以試著用,
中國禪宗六祖惠能提出「不思善、不思惡」的想法, 
 在我讀書會的老師們,很難理解這個觀點, 
 我曾經舉例說:當你在面對一個你認為對你懷著惡意的學生時, 如果你要教育他/她,是不是可以忘記他/她曾經對你怎麼惡,
只盡老師的職責去教育他/她。 
 你自己能夠在心裡拿捏自己對善惡的份量,這就是在朝不思善、不思惡前進, 這過程中如你已經可以超越善惡,
 不思善、惡自然會展現在內心的體會,用這樣的方法去「體驗自我」,應該是最快的。 
半寄 


( AI資料, 唯識學:起源於公元四、五世紀的印度,由彌勒、無著、世親等菩薩所創立和弘揚。它在部派佛教的基礎上,深入探討心識活動,提出了八識的學說,特別是第七識末那識和第八識阿賴耶識(藏識),以此來說明輪迴的主體與萬法的根源。 • 核心主張 • 部派佛教:雖然承認人無我(沒有實體不變的自我),但在「法」的層面,某些部派(如說一切有部)傾向於主張諸法實有。 • 唯識學:主張「萬法唯識,識外無境」,認為世間的一切現象、山河大地等皆是心識(阿賴耶識)所變現的影像,並非實有。這是一種「境無唯識」(外境是虛幻的,內識是存在的)的觀點,屬於北傳佛教的「有宗」。) 


Further Reflections on Yogācāra1

 

Recently, someone asked me again about Yogācāra, bringing me back to a field of Buddhist teachings I had long set aside.Buddhist ideas I had stopped thinking about for a long timeAs I have noted before, Buddhist thought eventually differentiated into schools such as idealism, consciousness-only theory, and doctrines of tathāgatagarbha. Even a person with a PhD degree in Buddhist studies may find these topics difficult to understand. 

 

These are not merely about theoretical study, but also involve the issue of actual practice. As Mahayana Buddhists often say, “understanding these teachings takes countless lifetimes.”

Simply put, all the different schools of Buddhist thought are trying to help us find our "True Nature."

Since Buddhism doesn't have a "God," it seems to uses ideas like "Mind-Only", "Consciousness", and the "Buddha-Nature" to take the place of a higher, unseen power—something like an all-pervasive consciousness. 

 

It feels as if people need to imagine an invisible master in order to feel secure. If that's true, wouldn't it be better to start by understanding ourselves?

 

But what is the "Self"? It's a very abstract idea. To really understand it, you need a lot of intellectual tools and knowledge. 

 

The theories mentioned here have existed in India for a long time, and it takes even more study to sort them out.

 

The screenshot below is from The Anabasis of Alexander(p.202), which talks about Indian philosophy. For most people, understanding the various Eastern and Western philosophies—whether materialist or idealist—can take one to twenty years.

 

There is, however, a simple method. The Sixth Patriarch Huineng proposed: “Do not think of good; do not think of evil.”

 

The teachers in my study group find this hard to understand. I once illustrated it this way: when you face a student whom you believe once disliked you, if you are to educate them, can you forget the past and simply fulfill your responsibility as a teacher?

If you can balance your thoughts of good and bad in your mind, you are already moving toward this practice. When you can rise above good and bad, the state of “not thinking of good or evil” naturally appears. Using this approach to experience the self might be the quickest way.

 

Master Banji

 

AI Data

Yogācāra originated in India during the 4th–5th centuries and was established and promoted by Maitreya, Asaṅga, Vasubandhu, and other bodhisattvas. Based on earlier Buddhist teachings, it looks closely at how the mind works. It teaches that there are eight types of consciousness, especially the seventh (manas) and eighth (ālaya-vijñāna, the storehouse consciousness). These explain why people continue in rebirth and where all experiences come from.

Main Ideas
• Early Buddhist Schools: They said people have no permanent self, but some schools (like the Sarvāstivāda) believed dharmas truly exist.
• Yogācāra: Says “everything is only consciousness; there is no world outside the mind.” Everything we see—mountains, rivers, the whole world—is a mental image produced by the ālaya-vijñāna

(The outside world is unreal; only mind is real. This is the “Mind-Only” view in Northern Buddhism.)

 

Text from the Screenshot

 

…He stood on the stone steps, still dripping with water, completely shocked. Sachar commented on the story: “Skandar thought many years had passed, but it was actually only a moment.” So he said, “See? You’re only an idea.”

The story Sachar told is a later version, and it likely came from a real meeting. Alexander met an Indian ascetic named Calanas in Taxila. Calanas became very interested in him and followed him all the way to Babylon. When Calanas knew he had an incurable illness, he sacrificed himself by climbing onto a funeral pyre and burning himself.

This shows that Alexander had chances to talk with skeptics, rationalists, materialists, and other Indian thinkers of the time. They probably discussed famous questions in Indian philosophy. Alexander may have found the similarities between Indian and Greek ideas especially fascinating—for example, how the two traditions…

 

(From The Anabasis of Alexander, p. 202)

(The words in bold in this screenshot are what Master Banji wants to highlight.)




沒有留言: